Claim LD10-HQ-C08 (v1.0)
This is an older version. Read the current version, v1.1, or what changed in it.
In four preregistered 2025–26 UK experiments, frontier AI out-persuaded strong human text persuaders; the advantage disappeared when AI was constrained to human message length and writing speed.
Provenance and status
- Claim type
- Estimate
- Publication status
- Eligible for publication, with qualifiers: preprint
- Verification state
- Checked against the primary source; the source is a preprint. Who checked this claim is not recorded for it; claim checks so far were AI-led, and no person has checked claims against their sources.
- Does not license
- Population-scale influence, face-to-face superiority or election outcomes
- Limitations
- Paid opt-in text setting; not peer-reviewed
- Source (as cited)
- Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475
- Source type
- Preprint (recorded as “Preprint”)
- Institutional position
- Academic + UK AISI
- Maturity of the evidence
- Emerging evidence
- Recorded date
- 25 September 2026
- Currentness / correction
- This is not the current version. No correction or concern is recorded on its sources.
Sources this version cites
Version
This page shows version v1.0. Its record never changes, even when newer evidence arrives; the site may add a note to the page or withhold a figure not cleared for public use.
NEWER VERSION EXISTS: read the current version, v1.1 (LD10-HQ-C08--v1.1). This version is explicitly superseded by LD10-HQ-C08--v1.1.
Raw record: every recorded field, with its coded values
All 25 canonical Claim fields, verbatim, with the coded values derived from them. The plain-language labels above are read from these.
- Claim type (coded)
- ESTIMATE (as printed: “ESTIMATE”)
- Publication status (coded)
- ELIGIBLE (PREPRINT) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH PREPRINT LABEL”)
- Verification state (coded)
- CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (PREPRINT)
- Source type (coded)
- PREPRINT
- Maturity (coded)
- EMERGING
| # | Canonical field | Canonical value (verbatim) | Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAIM ID | LD10-HQ-C08 | — |
| 2 | PUBLIC-FACING CLAIM | In four preregistered 2025–26 UK experiments, frontier AI out-persuaded strong human text persuaders; the advantage disappeared when AI was constrained to human message length and writing speed. | — |
| 3 | CLAIM TYPE | ESTIMATE | base_types: ESTIMATE |
| 4 | RESEARCH STRAND | A — Controlled persuasion | — |
| 5 | MATURITY | EMERGING | states: EMERGING |
| 6 | SOURCE | Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475 | source_ids: SRC-LD10-HACKENBURG-ARXIV-2606-16475 |
| 7 | SOURCE TYPE | Preprint | classes: PREPRINT |
| 8 | INSTITUTIONAL POSITION | Academic + UK AISI | — |
| 9 | SCOPE | UK Prolific; 10 policy stances; 2025–26 | — |
| 10 | DESIGN | Four preregistered RCTs | — |
| 11 | SAMPLE / DATASET | 18,978 conversations; 6,923 people | — |
| 12 | MODEL / TOOL / VERSION | Claude Opus 4.1/4.6, ChatGPT-4o, GPT-5.4, Grok 4.20, Gemini 2.5 Pro | — |
| 13 | COMPARATOR | Laypeople, selected laypeople, elite debaters, professional canvassers | — |
| 14 | MAIN RESULT | AI +8.2pp vs random laypeople; +5.6pp selected; +4.6pp elite debaters; throughput-constrained vs coached debaters 0.0pp [−1.7,+1.6] | — |
| 15 | INFERENTIAL TARGET | Newer-vintage AI-human persuasion gap and throughput mechanism | — |
| 16 | DOES NOT LICENSE | Population-scale influence, face-to-face superiority or election outcomes | — |
| 17 | VERIFICATION STATE | CONTENT VERIFIED PREPRINT | state: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · qualifiers: PREPRINT · verified_by: UNKNOWN |
| 18 | LIMITATIONS | Paid opt-in text setting; not peer-reviewed | — |
| 19 | CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCES | C07 older meta-analysis shows vintage contrast | — |
| 20 | GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGE | UK / English | — |
| 21 | DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGER | Frontier-model access and throughput may advantage resource-rich communicators | — |
| 22 | R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKS | D7, D3, T1, R-1 | — |
| 23 | WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM? | Peer-review revision or naturalistic replication | — |
| 24 | PUBLICATION STATUS | ELIGIBLE WITH PREPRINT LABEL | state: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: PREPRINT |
| 25 | RECORDED DATE | 2026-09-25 | — |
Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: D7 (DOMAIN); D3 (DOMAIN); T1 (TENSION); R-1 (LENS)
The sources as recorded, with their record IDs and coded source types:
Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)
- “Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475” → Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475 (SRC-LD10-HACKENBURG-ARXIV-2606-16475--v1.0) — Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475; class PREPRINT (explicit public provenance pin)
Cited by Living Debate versions
Cite this page
SocioLens project. (2026, September 25). In four preregistered 2025–26 UK experiments, frontier AI out-persuaded strong human text persuaders; the advantage disappeared when AI was constrained to human message length and writing speed [Claim LD10-HQ-C08, version v1.0]. SocioLens. https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld10-hq-c08/v1.0/
@misc{sociolens_ld10_hq_c08_v1_0,
author = {{SocioLens project}},
title = {In four preregistered 2025–26 UK experiments, frontier AI out-persuaded strong human text persuaders; the advantage disappeared when AI was constrained to human message length and writing speed.},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-09-25},
howpublished = {\url{https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld10-hq-c08/v1.0/}},
note = {Claim LD10-HQ-C08, version v1.0}
}The link points to this version, whose record never changes. For a finding, cite the original study as well: SocioLens summarizes research and does not replace it.
Research-of-record provenance
Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 f0668e1b9b31025347126db865c91766ff9d8d19d001785f6aa60bfe9a8f3134.
Frozen Drive-derived inputs
- R07 — LD-10 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED (v1.0) — Drive ID
1f9tgGnqv80_UyhW0kCgcnTgWNPlx-DYM; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified ; block “ENTRY 08 — LD10-HQ-C08 ” SHA-256ed3ed34cba7ee7fdcf72a02238c787ca4c57acc30a2fca5c7bc166f69c2ea767; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT.”; frozen fixturefixtures/frozen/r07-ld10-claim-ledger-v1.0-canonical.
Builder decisions (not Drive data)
- VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the canonical ledger artifact version (R07 — LD-10 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0); Implementation Architecture Selection §5 logical_id/version convention.
- CURRENT_POINTER = false — basis: not current: superseded by LD10-HQ-C08--v1.1 (manifest supersedes relation)
- FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-LD10-HACKENBURG-ARXIV-2606-16475--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 08 — LD10-HQ-C08 cites "Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475"; the frozen field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's ledger block (fixtures/frozen/r07-ld10-claim-ledger-v1.0-canonical); Drive-derived identity authority (Issue #53 Source inventory, factory-hq decision HQ-ESC-sociolens-ld10-t5-20261011T050405Z-01 ruling 3 inventory S5): R07 Batch 01 lines 163, 165; ledger C08 fields 6/7/8; KEY EVIDENCE line 931 of the locked LD-10 Living Debate.
- SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-LD10-HACKENBURG-ARXIV-2606-16475--v1.0 — basis: Issue #5 proof rendering (Architecture Proof Protocol v0.1 AP-08 / Amendment v1.2 §6): explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion — the pinned field-6 Source record "Hackenburg et al. 2026, arXiv:2606.16475"; Drive-derived identity authority (Issue #53 Source inventory, factory-hq decision HQ-ESC-sociolens-ld10-t5-20261011T050405Z-01 ruling 3 inventory S5): R07 Batch 01 lines 163, 165; ledger C08 fields 6/7/8; KEY EVIDENCE line 931 of the locked LD-10 Living Debate.