Preview: not announced. Search engines asked not to index.

Claim LD03-SL-C10 (v1.0)

The authors of a survey of 576 public managers in seven EU member states describe public servants using generative AI to draft reports, refine policy proposals and generate content, often without explicit approval or institutional policies, which they call 'shadow use'; the abstract does not say how much of this the survey itself measured.

Research opportunities this claim motivates

What this claim leaves open for research. Each is a hypothesis about a gap, not a finding.

Provenance and status

Claim type
Estimate
Publication status
Eligible for publication, with a qualifier
Verification state
Checked against the abstract of the primary source only. Who checked this claim is not recorded for it; claim checks so far were AI-led, and no person has checked claims against their sources.
Does not license
Its prevalence by country; effects on output or services
Limitations
Checked against the official abstract only, read in the Crossref record on 15 October 2026; the countries and the share of shadow use were not read; the authors' affiliation with the European Commission's Joint Research Centre was not confirmed
Source (as cited)
Tangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCS
Source type
Peer-reviewed conference paper (recorded as “Peer-reviewed conference paper”)
Institutional position
Not checked
Maturity of the evidence
Emerging evidence
Recorded date
15 October 2026
Currentness / correction
This is the current version. No correction or concern is recorded on its sources.

Sources this version cites

Version

This is the current version, v1.0. Earlier versions stay available, and their records never change.

Versions: v1.0 · current

Raw record: every recorded field, with its coded values

All 25 canonical Claim fields, verbatim, with the coded values derived from them. The plain-language labels above are read from these.

Claim type (coded)
ESTIMATE (as printed: “ESTIMATE”)
Publication status (coded)
ELIGIBLE (QUALIFIED) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH QUALIFIER”)
Verification state (coded)
CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (ABSTRACT_ONLY)
Source type (coded)
PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER
Maturity (coded)
EMERGING
#Canonical fieldCanonical value (verbatim)Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1CLAIM IDLD03-SL-C10—
2PUBLIC-FACING CLAIMThe authors of a survey of 576 public managers in seven EU member states describe public servants using generative AI to draft reports, refine policy proposals and generate content, often without explicit approval or institutional policies, which they call 'shadow use'; the abstract does not say how much of this the survey itself measured.—
3CLAIM TYPEESTIMATEbase_types: ESTIMATE
4RESEARCH STRANDE — Organizational practice and decoupling—
5MATURITYEMERGINGstates: EMERGING
6SOURCETangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCSsource_ids: SRC-SL-TANGI-RODRIGUEZ-MULLER-COMBETTO-EPART-2025
7SOURCE TYPEPeer-reviewed conference paperclasses: PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER
8INSTITUTIONAL POSITIONNot checked—
9SCOPEPublic administrations in seven EU member states—
10DESIGNSurvey—
11SAMPLE / DATASET576 public managers—
12MODEL / TOOL / VERSIONGenerative AI tools in general—
13COMPARATORNone—
14MAIN RESULTGenerative-AI use for drafting, policy refinement and content generation, often without explicit approval or institutional policy ('shadow use')—
15INFERENTIAL TARGETWhether generative-AI use in public administration runs ahead of formal adoption—
16DOES NOT LICENSEIts prevalence by country; effects on output or services—
17VERIFICATION STATECONTENT VERIFIED ABSTRACTstate: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · qualifiers: ABSTRACT_ONLY · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18LIMITATIONSChecked against the official abstract only, read in the Crossref record on 15 October 2026; the countries and the share of shadow use were not read; the authors' affiliation with the European Commission's Joint Research Centre was not confirmed—
19CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCESConsistent with US survey evidence that worker use runs ahead of firm adoption—
20GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGEEU / English—
21DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGERNot analysed in this claim—
22R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKSLD-03, D2—
23WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?Full-text figures on how common unapproved use is—
24PUBLICATION STATUSELIGIBLE WITH QUALIFIERstate: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: QUALIFIED
25RECORDED DATE2026-10-15—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-03 (LIVING_DEBATE); D2 (DOMAIN)

The sources as recorded, with their record IDs and coded source types:

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

  • “Tangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCS” → Tangi et al. (2025), “A Silent Partner: The Shadow…” (SRC-SL-TANGI-RODRIGUEZ-MULLER-COMBETTO-EPART-2025--v1.0) — Tangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCS; class PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (explicit public provenance pin)

Cited by Living Debate versions

Cite this page

SocioLens project. (2026, October 15). The authors of a survey of 576 public managers in seven EU member states describe public servants using generative AI to draft reports, refine policy proposals and generate content, often without explicit approval or institutional policies, which they call 'shadow use'; the abstract does not say how much of this the survey itself measured [Claim LD03-SL-C10, version v1.0]. SocioLens. https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld03-sl-c10/v1.0/

@misc{sociolens_ld03_sl_c10_v1_0,
  author = {{SocioLens project}},
  title = {The authors of a survey of 576 public managers in seven EU member states describe public servants using generative AI to draft reports, refine policy proposals and generate content, often without explicit approval or institutional policies, which they call 'shadow use'; the abstract does not say how much of this the survey itself measured.},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-10-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld03-sl-c10/v1.0/}},
  note = {Claim LD03-SL-C10, version v1.0}
}

The link points to this version, whose record never changes. For a finding, cite the original study as well: SocioLens summarizes research and does not replace it.

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 3956c215347e53b4f25b5ec21537764c2e463dd15d3fa6da9ee8e56686aaec31.

Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)

  • SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C10 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-15; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-03 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-03 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 10 — LD03-SL-C10” SHA-256 5c64198443052c2b3a4fe1870824e18750d815ccdad6a14937dcc0ad223d9e76; fixture fixtures/authored/claims/LD03-SL-C10--v1.0.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

  • VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C10 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-03 debate
  • CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C10 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-15); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-03 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-03 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts
  • FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-TANGI-RODRIGUEZ-MULLER-COMBETTO-EPART-2025--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 10 — LD03-SL-C10 cites "Tangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCS"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
  • SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-TANGI-RODRIGUEZ-MULLER-COMBETTO-EPART-2025--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "Tangi, Rodriguez Müller & Combetto, “A Silent Partner: The Shadow Presence of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Public Administrations,” Electronic Participation (ePart 2025), LNCS".