urn:uuid:ec2bd6bc-958d-5e81-938a-8f0634a3998b New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on. 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z SocioLens urn:uuid:fa72f85a-1041-58e8-b506-994b1f91516b 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z

What changed: The claim now says that generative AI systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 to meet the Article 50(2) machine-readable marking obligation, and cites Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus on AI) as a third Source. The 2 August 2026 date for the other Article 50 obligations is unchanged. Why: A newer-evidence check on 13 October 2026 found that version 1.0 missed the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026, published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026, before the 25 September evidence cut-off), so a reader could take every Article 50 duty as binding from August. Recital 38 of the Regulation sets a four-month transitional period for providers who placed their systems on the market before 2 August 2026, which ends on 2 December 2026; that date is also stated by law-firm summaries (A&O Shearman; Ropes & Gray, 3 August 2026). The recital was read on EUR-Lex by an AI agent, not a person. The operative provision, Article 111(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as inserted by Article 1, point (39)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (providers of AI systems generating synthetic content placed on the market before 2 August 2026 "shall take the necessary steps in order to comply with Article 50(2) by 2 December 2026"), was read by an AI agent in a secondary consolidated copy, and a second AI review run by the Owner located it in the EUR-Lex text.

urn:uuid:4c1fcfde-e59d-595e-a007-72c917c961bf 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z

Literature check added: a second, deeper search for existing work, with its queries, new nearest work and limits. The question and verdict stand.

urn:uuid:23a9d22a-ce09-5bcc-8b6e-d4aea8dc85c9 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z

Cost band corrected from "low to medium" to "medium": participant payments of about US$10,000 to 25,000 need a grant or project budget, in line with other opportunities of that size. Found in the independent review of the opportunity-page fixes. The question, design, literature check and verdict are unchanged.

urn:uuid:977e0e48-b822-53f6-a34e-e69e07152284 2026-10-12T00:00:00Z

On a live, open social platform, when labels saying that a post is AI-generated, or that it is AI-generated and potentially misleading, are applied at random to real political and news posts in users' feeds, how do they change actual reposts, likes and replies, and users' belief in the labelled claims, compared with unlabelled posts?