<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:cceaaadb-7447-5128-bc49-e8409e21e542</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD03-07: Is the time AI saves paid for with weaker checking?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld03-07/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld03-07/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:daa9dde0-956d-5aff-9995-e4049d387f79</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD03-07 — Is the time AI saves paid for with weaker checking?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld03-07/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Where public services and clinics turn the time saved by generative-AI drafting into higher caseloads (social-work case records, clinical notes), does the time spent checking each output fall and the share of errors that survive into the signed record rise, and how much of any rise comes from time pressure rather than from a decline in the checkers&apos; own skill?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
